All hail Nick the creator of an awsome system. As I use this system I have been noticing a kind of strong trend for O/U's as well. Though it has not stood the test of time that Nicks system has, I'd say for this past week it's been about 5 - 1. And thats good money with the value of O/U's.

Anyway, what I've been doing is using the star system for O/U's the same as for the games, but instead of it being a 20* difference I bumped it up to at least a 40* difference. The O/U must agree with the estimatorn as well. So far this week it lost only once and the was with the Yanks and only by 1 run. Follow it and see, may be worth a look...

P.S. It just won tonight with the under in the Seattle game.

Yea, I've been noticing this trend too. I'm new here but since I started use Nick's system the totals aspect of it seemed to start to stick out at me. Hope it's consistant. Nothing like a soild "good value" play in baseball.

bDNews

I've been doing the same thing, but I still use the 20* difference as a qualifier. In order for me to play the game, the Estimator total has to be at least .5 a run over or under the actual line. I've had five bets since last Sunday, and only missed one. So far, all of the plays have been to the UNDER, and the only one that missed was when they Yanks beat Toronto 15-1. As the season goes on, maybe things will shift. My play for today is the UNDER 9 1/2 in the Tampa Bay/Baltimore game.

Are any of the Super Situations broken down by playoff games only? Since the playoffs are "the second season", would the results pan out pretty much the same?

berrang

add up all of the stars for totals for both teams.
if the difference is equal to or more than 40 for one or other, check the estimator.
if the estimator agrees with the stars, that's your play



chop

I notice a lot of unders as well. Not sure why. maybe it's just a pattern for now. but I'm following daily