|
Welcome:
Login to StatFox |
Register |
Login to FoxSheets
|
The Leading Logic In Sports Handicapping |
|
                 |
|
|
|
|

 |
GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS 19-48 |
 |
|
|
|
WESTERN Standings for the 2009-10 Season |
|
PACIFIC Division |
|
|
All |
ATS |
Scoring |
Home/Away |
|
LA LAKERS |
50 |
18 |
0.735 |
29 |
37 |
2 |
43.9% |
103.0 |
97.0 |
30-5 |
20-13 |
|
PHOENIX |
42 |
26 |
0.618 |
38 |
29 |
1 |
56.7% |
110.1 |
106.1 |
26-9 |
16-17 |
|
LA CLIPPERS |
26 |
43 |
0.377 |
30 |
38 |
1 |
44.1% |
95.6 |
101.4 |
19-15 |
7-28 |
|
SACRAMENTO |
23 |
45 |
0.338 |
34 |
32 |
2 |
51.5% |
100.8 |
104.8 |
17-17 |
6-28 |
|
GOLDEN STATE |
19 |
48 |
0.284 |
39 |
27 |
1 |
59.1% |
108.0 |
111.5 |
15-20 |
4-28 |
|
|
| Last 20 Games for the 2009-10 Season |
| Last 20 Games |
All Games YTD
|
|
March 2010 |
|
3-17-10 |
vs NEW ORLEANS |
-2.5 |
227.5 |
131-121 |
W |
W |
Ov |
54.0% |
48.1% |
92.3% |
42 |
51.2% |
33.3% |
76.5% |
50 |
|
3-15-10 |
vs LA LAKERS |
+8.5 |
224.5 |
121-124 |
L |
W |
Ov |
48.0% |
43.3% |
92.3% |
31 |
56.0% |
30.0% |
81.0% |
63 |
|
3-13-10 |
vs TORONTO |
+2.5 |
232 |
124-112 |
W |
W |
Ov |
47.4% |
59.3% |
81.8% |
47 |
56.6% |
50.0% |
78.3% |
45 |
|
3-11-10 |
vs PORTLAND |
+6 |
215.5 |
105-110 |
L |
W |
Un |
47.5% |
38.5% |
90.5% |
41 |
41.9% |
46.7% |
83.8% |
59 |
|
3-8-10 |
at NEW ORLEANS |
+6 |
217 |
131-135 |
L |
W |
Ov |
58.8% |
52.0% |
85.7% |
29 |
58.7% |
45.5% |
70.8% |
54 |
|
3-6-10 |
at CHARLOTTE |
+10 |
205.5 |
90-101 |
L |
L |
Un |
38.2% |
43.5% |
63.2% |
43 |
46.0% |
25.0% |
72.7% |
72 |
|
3-5-10 |
at ATLANTA |
+13.5 |
212 |
122-127 |
L |
W |
Ov |
50.0% |
42.3% |
80.6% |
46 |
53.0% |
50.0% |
75.0% |
52 |
|
3-3-10 |
at ORLANDO |
+15 |
214.5 |
90-117 |
L |
L |
Un |
42.7% |
43.5% |
66.7% |
37 |
52.2% |
23.8% |
75.0% |
64 |
|
3-2-10 |
at MIAMI |
+10 |
200.5 |
106-110 |
L |
W |
Ov |
51.2% |
29.0% |
52.9% |
42 |
49.4% |
35.7% |
67.7% |
61 |
|
February 2010 |
|
2-27-10 |
vs DETROIT |
-4 |
206.5 |
95-88 |
W |
W |
Un |
41.2% |
32.3% |
60.0% |
57 |
43.0% |
37.5% |
42.3% |
67 |
|
2-25-10 |
vs DENVER |
+6 |
226.5 |
112-127 |
L |
L |
Ov |
41.7% |
41.7% |
88.0% |
50 |
51.1% |
59.3% |
60.7% |
65 |
|
2-23-10 |
vs PHILADELPHIA |
PK |
216 |
102-110 |
L |
L |
Un |
37.9% |
39.4% |
81.0% |
54 |
48.2% |
45.0% |
82.6% |
57 |
|
2-21-10 |
vs ATLANTA |
+5 |
212 |
108-104 |
W |
W |
P |
53.6% |
25.0% |
71.4% |
47 |
45.5% |
33.3% |
67.9% |
55 |
|
2-19-10 |
vs UTAH |
+5 |
221.5 |
89-100 |
L |
L |
Un |
37.2% |
38.1% |
92.0% |
51 |
42.7% |
38.1% |
66.7% |
59 |
|
2-17-10 |
vs SACRAMENTO |
-4.5 |
224 |
130-98 |
W |
W |
Ov |
51.5% |
50.0% |
85.7% |
54 |
42.2% |
27.8% |
70.8% |
55 |
|
2-16-10 |
at LA LAKERS |
+12.5 |
215.5 |
94-104 |
L |
W |
Un |
41.7% |
37.0% |
73.7% |
42 |
44.7% |
27.3% |
71.0% |
68 |
|
2-10-10 |
vs LA CLIPPERS |
+2 |
214 |
132-102 |
W |
W |
Ov |
62.0% |
59.1% |
75.0% |
49 |
42.0% |
46.7% |
80.8% |
44 |
|
2-8-10 |
vs DALLAS |
+5 |
216.5 |
117-127 |
L |
L |
Ov |
49.4% |
40.0% |
86.2% |
42 |
52.1% |
54.5% |
89.1% |
44 |
|
2-6-10 |
vs OKLAHOMA CITY |
+3.5 |
215.5 |
95-104 |
L |
L |
Un |
42.0% |
34.8% |
61.9% |
59 |
42.2% |
42.9% |
91.7% |
54 |
|
2-3-10 |
at DALLAS |
+11.5 |
218 |
101-110 |
L |
W |
Un |
49.4% |
37.5% |
70.4% |
47 |
54.4% |
29.4% |
90.5% |
38 |
|
|
Game Situation Report for the 2009-10 Season Season |
|
67 |
19-48 (28.4%) |
39-27-1 (59.1%) |
33-33-1 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
108.0 |
111.5 |
-3.5 |
|
35 |
15-20 (42.9%) |
21-14-0 (60.0%) |
19-15-1 |
55.9% |
44.1% |
111.5 |
110.5 |
+1.0 |
|
32 |
4-28 (12.5%) |
18-13-1 (58.1%) |
14-18-0 |
43.8% |
56.3% |
104.2 |
112.6 |
-8.5 |
|
27 |
9-18 (33.3%) |
16-10-1 (61.5%) |
13-13-1 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
106.8 |
108.7 |
-1.9 |
|
40 |
10-30 (25.0%) |
23-17-0 (57.5%) |
20-20-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
108.8 |
113.4 |
-4.6 |
|
8 |
5-3 (62.5%) |
6-2-0 (75.0%) |
3-5-0 |
37.5% |
62.5% |
107.8 |
102.8 |
+5.0 |
|
10 |
3-7 (30.0%) |
6-3-1 (66.7%) |
4-6-0 |
40.0% |
60.0% |
106.6 |
107.3 |
-0.7 |
|
9 |
1-8 (11.1%) |
4-5-0 (44.4%) |
6-2-1 |
75.0% |
25.0% |
106.1 |
115.4 |
-9.3 |
|
14 |
3-11 (21.4%) |
7-7-0 (50.0%) |
7-7-0 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
109.4 |
115.1 |
-5.7 |
|
13 |
3-10 (23.1%) |
7-6-0 (53.8%) |
6-7-0 |
46.2% |
53.8% |
106.9 |
111.0 |
-4.1 |
|
13 |
4-9 (30.8%) |
9-4-0 (69.2%) |
7-6-0 |
53.8% |
46.2% |
109.9 |
114.0 |
-4.1 |
|
14 |
8-6 (57.1%) |
8-6-0 (57.1%) |
8-6-0 |
57.1% |
42.9% |
112.8 |
106.9 |
+5.9 |
|
51 |
10-41 (19.6%) |
30-20-1 (60.0%) |
25-25-1 |
50.0% |
50.0% |
106.8 |
113.3 |
-6.4 |
|
13 |
8-5 (61.5%) |
8-5-0 (61.5%) |
7-6-0 |
53.8% |
46.2% |
113.2 |
105.8 |
+7.4 |
|
21 |
7-14 (33.3%) |
13-8-0 (61.9%) |
12-8-1 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
110.8 |
113.4 |
-2.6 |
|
1 |
0-1 (0.0%) |
0-1-0 (0.0%) |
1-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
107.0 |
120.0 |
-13.0 |
|
30 |
3-27 (10.0%) |
17-12-1 (58.6%) |
13-17-0 |
43.3% |
56.7% |
104.0 |
113.2 |
-9.1 |
|
15 |
3-12 (20.0%) |
9-6-0 (60.0%) |
7-8-0 |
46.7% |
53.3% |
108.2 |
112.9 |
-4.7 |
|
36 |
12-24 (33.3%) |
19-16-1 (54.3%) |
18-17-1 |
51.4% |
48.6% |
108.3 |
111.1 |
-2.8 |
|
10 |
2-8 (20.0%) |
8-2-0 (80.0%) |
6-4-0 |
60.0% |
40.0% |
108.9 |
113.1 |
-4.2 |
|
6 |
2-4 (33.3%) |
3-3-0 (50.0%) |
2-4-0 |
33.3% |
66.7% |
103.7 |
107.7 |
-4.0 |
|
3 |
0-3 (0.0%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 |
66.7% |
33.3% |
109.3 |
123.7 |
-14.3 |
|
3 |
2-1 (66.7%) |
2-1-0 (66.7%) |
3-0-0 |
100.0% |
0.0% |
128.7 |
108.7 |
+20.0 |
|
9 |
1-8 (11.1%) |
5-4-0 (55.6%) |
2-7-0 |
22.2% |
77.8% |
101.0 |
110.8 |
-9.8 |
|
18 |
3-15 (16.7%) |
11-6-1 (64.7%) |
8-10-0 |
44.4% |
55.6% |
105.4 |
112.8 |
-7.4 |
|
48 |
16-32 (33.3%) |
28-20-0 (58.3%) |
24-23-1 |
51.1% |
48.9% |
108.9 |
111.1 |
-2.1 |
|
38 |
10-28 (26.3%) |
23-14-1 (62.2%) |
16-22-0 |
42.1% |
57.9% |
105.9 |
110.8 |
-4.9 |
|
27 |
9-18 (33.3%) |
16-11-0 (59.3%) |
16-10-1 |
61.5% |
38.5% |
111.4 |
113.0 |
-1.6 |
|
|
Last Game Statistics |
|
3-17-10 vs NEW ORLEANS (Won 131-121) |
| Starters |
|
G |
C Watson |
29 |
7 |
25.0% |
75.0% |
5.3% |
|
G |
M Ellis |
48 |
28 |
43.5% |
100.0% |
21.4% |
|
F |
C Maggette |
24 |
14 |
50.0% |
80.0% |
10.7% |
|
F |
A Morrow |
18 |
5 |
50.0% |
100.0% |
3.8% |
|
C |
A Tolliver |
44 |
30 |
57.9% |
100.0% |
22.9% |
| Bench |
|
G |
D George |
17 |
8 |
60.0% |
0.0% |
6.1% |
|
F |
C Hunter |
29 |
17 |
77.8% |
100.0% |
13.0% |
|
F |
R Williams |
31 |
22 |
72.7% |
100.0% |
16.8% |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|