 |
cebrake
Registered: Apr 2009
Posts: 91
|
I think that it just evened out.
|
12-12-11 01:19 PM |
|
|
|  |
  |
Buccan
Registered: Nov 2010
Posts: 52
|
Sawyer, please, keep posting them...
If somebody can't follow, will not follow.
This is a long term, so, if somebody have a good bankroll admn. and lose a good run, can miss some good opportunities.
I remember with your NBA totals last year, we miss a lot of good runs after a bad runs and you decided to stop follow during this time.
(hope you understand me....)
Thanks!
|
12-12-11 02:08 PM |
|
|
|  |
  |
JDilla2380
Registered: Jun 2011
Posts: 132
|
If the books have adjusted, which I was thinking as well last night, then perhaps it's time to revise NHL betting strategies. The number of favorite wins has been excessive and I wouldn't expect it to continue at the same rate. However, if it did we could start to look for value playing the opposite way on your system. Maybe we should keep an eye on how small to moderate favorites perform against your system in the next couple weeks.
|
12-12-11 03:49 PM |
|
|
|  |
  |
lineshark
Registered: Nov 2011
Posts: 662
|
I agree with the other posters. Decision to continue posting plays is yours, but i think you should at least keep playing them yourself. There is no point to wait until they get hot again. Then you would lost during the cold streak, but miss the hot streak.
You know, statistically speaking, with the total number of plays you had last year and this year in total, there is a %11 chance that you would end up with 12 consecutive losses at some point if we assume a win rate of %45. Even at %50 win rate, the chance of happening the last couple of days would be %4. So past few days are not a surprise at all.
|
12-12-11 06:24 PM |
|
|
|  |
  |
dld3151
FoxDen Hall of Famer

Registered: Nov 2005
Posts: 1119
|
Sawyer, I also encourage you to continue posting these plays throughout the entire season. Based on my experiences with the Iron Dogs last season (as well as your NBA method two years ago), I started this NHL season ready for the full ride. As has been mentioned, you owe nobody a thing. I received all of those +46 units last season, so if anything I'm the one who owes. Now, here are a couple of observations. Please read and consider these strongly:
1. If you took the most recent Iron Dogs downturn and scattered those negative units (13 or 14, I think) over the entire season, nobody would notice them. Just assign 1 negative unit to 13 or 14 different weeks across the 6-month season -- as opposed to having them bunched in this 5-day stretch -- and they're absolutely no problem. It would almost be as if they didn't happen. So, why do we often think something is "wrong" when those negative units occur is a short timespan? I don't think anything is necessarily wrong. What you're witnessing is random occurrence, variance, pure and simple. It happens in this fashion because, mathematically, it CAN happen. And many thanks to Lineshark for pointing out the probability of this type of negative run occurring. The truth is, if you flip coins long enough, a run of 2 heads and 16 tails is going to happen. We all know that. It's rare, but it will happen. Yet, over a period of 10,000 flips, the heads and tails are going to be in the 49-51 percent range.
2. I do not agree that the linesmaker has adjusted to the Iron Dogs. Seriously? No, not a chance. And here's the proof. If that were true, then wouldn't you be seeing a significant difference in Iron Dog prices this season, as opposed to last season? Yes, you definitely would! But that has NOT happened. The fact is, your average price per play last season was roughly +135. And it's the same this season. Personally, I'm running at about +132 at the moment. I keep tabs on this stuff because I want to know what my average price is at all times. If the oddsmakers had "caught on" to anything, you would see those numbers plummet, big time. Suddenly, you'd easily be looking at average Iron Dog prices of +110, at best. Sawyer, you know the parameters of the Iron Dog plays. Some oddsmaker may have an idea and may be able to guess which teams are going to be the Iron Dogs on a given day, but you are the one who really knows. Besides that, I'm quite sure there are any number of NHL capping theories that would support the opposite side of every Iron Dog play. That's true for every sport. And, in the large majority of cases, that is what keeps the lines from jumping all over the place. Thousands of cappers have different views of every single game. So, they line up on opposite sides and wait to see what occurs on the field, or ice.
3. What has occurred on the ice recently is a run of blown leads and bad beats. We've had about a month of this, with the worst of it happening the past few days. It sucks. But I can't control what happens once the puck is dropped. All I can do is watch the score change on ESPN.com or Yahoo.com and react ... or better yet, NOT react.
4. JacksonJohn made a good point the other day when he mentioned that he plays each game at 1.5 percent of bankroll and resets his bet size after each 25-percent gain. That's an excellent strategy. This downturn has definitely made me reconsider my own 2.5 percent of BR per-game bet size. True, it did work very well last season, when I never experienced more than a 6 or 7-unit drop before an immediate turnaround happened. But sometimes you have to be prepared to weather a bigger storm!
Anyway, here's hoping you at least continue to post the Iron Dogs. Either way, best of luck and thanks!
|
12-12-11 09:23 PM |
|
|
|  |
|