StatFox.com - Sports Handicapping Community

The Leading Logic In Sports Handicapping

The FoxDen Forum : Powered by vBulletin version 2.3.0 The FoxDen Forum > Sports Handicapping, Trends, and Stats > Best Week 17 Nfl Trend Ever!!
Search The Fox Den Forum:

Subscribe to this Thread
Pages (4): [1] 2 3 4 »

Last Message   Next Message
    
Author
Message    Post A Reply
lf25bonds
FoxDen Hall of Famer

Registered: Oct 2006
Posts: 1309

Best Week 17 Nfl Trend Ever!!

After over an hour of research I found a trend out and since you have made so much money for you this year I wanted to share this with you .

I went back to 2002 and found 13 games where a team had their playoff position locked up and had nothing to play for and were week 17 underdogs. In those games the favorites were 12-1 SU and 11-2 ATS. The only time the team that had nothing to play for won was the 04 steelers whose backups were a decent Tommy Maddox and Willie Parker.

Another interesting thing is that the favoref worse team scored at least 30 points in 10 of those 13 games. The playoff bound teams play none of their d line at all cause that's the position which gets hurt the most and they get scored heavily upon.

So what does all this mean?

Bet on the bills, the panthers, the jets and the texans! Also, bet on the over in all of those games!

Old Post 01-02-10 09:37 AM
lf25bonds is offline Click Here to See the Profile for lf25bonds Click here to Send lf25bonds a Private Message Edit post   Report post
copperblue
FoxDen Hall of Famer

Registered: Apr 2006
Posts: 6727

Thanks for this

Will look further

BOL

Old Post 01-02-10 09:51 AM
copperblue is offline Click Here to See the Profile for copperblue Click here to Send copperblue a Private Message Edit post   Report post
noelcran
FoxDen Hall of Famer

Registered: Feb 2009
Posts: 729

i like your reasoning will have a little wager on these




aussie and proud

Old Post 01-02-10 12:36 PM
noelcran is offline Click Here to See the Profile for noelcran Click here to Send noelcran a Private Message Edit post   Report post
cisco
FoxDen Hall of Famer

Registered: Jul 2004
Posts: 8617

You said it, look at those lines.

Buf -9 ov Ind
Jets -10 ov Cin
Hou -9 ov NE
Car ?

Old Post 01-02-10 02:06 PM
cisco is offline Click Here to See the Profile for cisco Click here to Send cisco a Private Message Edit post   Report post
unc4me84


Registered: Nov 2008
Posts: 697

where can you find the lines from further back than 06-07 seasons? Wagerline and espn both only go back 3 years. From what I found though, the last 3 games went UNDER, and the 1 game that qualified from the 06-07 season went OVER. But out of the 4 games I can see, all won SU and all covered spread with the exception of Minnesota against the Giants last year, but Minnesota still won SU

Old Post 01-02-10 02:40 PM
unc4me84 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for unc4me84 Click here to Send unc4me84 a Private Message Edit post   Report post
SteelHop


Registered: Dec 2006
Posts: 18

covers goes back into the 90's for most sports.

Old Post 01-02-10 02:54 PM
SteelHop is offline Click Here to See the Profile for SteelHop Edit post   Report post
markinc7
FoxDen Hall of Famer

Registered: Nov 2008
Posts: 1589

What do ya think?

Looks like a great 4 team teaser play?




"The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not."
Thomas Jefferson

Old Post 01-02-10 02:58 PM
markinc7 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for markinc7 Click here to Send markinc7 a Private Message Edit post   Report post
msudogs
Moderator

Registered: Nov 2005
Posts: 41463

where have you been? missed you in baseball this year & don't be such a stranger. thanks for these nuggets
GL

Old Post 01-02-10 02:58 PM
msudogs is offline Click Here to See the Profile for msudogs Click here to Send msudogs a Private Message Edit post   Report post
unc4me84


Registered: Nov 2008
Posts: 697

SteelHop

Wagerline = Covers

If you can find those past odds/results on covers or any other site I would be grateful for someone pointing me in that direction

Old Post 01-02-10 03:23 PM
unc4me84 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for unc4me84 Click here to Send unc4me84 a Private Message Edit post   Report post
unc4me84


Registered: Nov 2008
Posts: 697

deleted post

Old Post 01-02-10 03:38 PM
unc4me84 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for unc4me84 Click here to Send unc4me84 a Private Message Edit post   Report post
keyman


Registered: May 2004
Posts: 23

Query on Killer Sports

This is the query, may not be exact to your trend, but should be similar.

week=17 and wins>=10 and o:wins<=7 and line>0

SU: 2-9-0 (-9.1) Teaser Records
ATS: 2-9-0 (-5.7) avg line: 3.4 +6: 5-6-0 (45.5%) +10: 9-2-0 (81.8%) +13: 9-2-0 (81.8%)
O/U: 5-5-1 (1.0) avg total: 40.6 +6: 7-4-0 (63.6%) +10: 7-3-1 (70.0%) +13: 9-2-0 (81.8%)

Old Post 01-02-10 04:22 PM
keyman is offline Click Here to See the Profile for keyman Click here to Send keyman a Private Message Edit post   Report post
timande
FoxDen Hall of Famer

Registered: Nov 2006
Posts: 1191

becareful with NE as they will be possibly be playing for seeding

Old Post 01-02-10 04:28 PM
timande is offline Click Here to See the Profile for timande Click here to Send timande a Private Message Edit post   Report post
lf25bonds
FoxDen Hall of Famer

Registered: Oct 2006
Posts: 1309

You can find old lines through statfox. I'll post up all the research in a couple hours.

Secondly, why would new England care about seeding enough to risk hurting their guys? They will have home field in first game and road the second.

Msudogs, thanks for the kind words. I check out the forum for info but I think I got 4 posts in a row wrong so I didn't want to lose people money so I took a break from posting.

I'll put up the numbers to back this up soon

Old Post 01-02-10 04:46 PM
lf25bonds is offline Click Here to See the Profile for lf25bonds Click here to Send lf25bonds a Private Message Edit post   Report post
lf25bonds
FoxDen Hall of Famer

Registered: Oct 2006
Posts: 1309

All of the following teams entered week 17 clinched for playoffs and not playing for home field going back to 2002.

2002

San Francisco- +3 Loss 31-20

2004

philly +4 Loss 38-10

Pitt +9.5 Win 29-24

2005

chicago +5.5 loss 34-10

Seattle +6 Push(loss SU) 23-17

Cinci +10.5 loss 37-3

2006

New Orleans +3 loss 31-21

2007

Dallas +9 Loss 27-6

Tampa Bay +3 loss 31-23

Indy +4.5 Loss 16-10

Jax +7 Loss 42-28

2008

NYG +7 Loss SU Win ATS 20-19



The only two covers were Pitt in 2004 and the Giants last year.

The only straight up win was Pittsburgh as I mentioned earlier.

Also. Take note of the score each time the favorite won. The average score in that situation was 32.

We arrive at this:

Bills -8.5 and OVER 33 for the game total
(not neccessarily a parlay, but worthwhile to do so)

Carolina -7.5 (no total available but take the over regardless)

Houston -8 and OVER 46 (like this total a little less because all we know is houston will score at least 30)

Jets -10 and the OVER 35

This is my favorite because cinci will not be playing their D-line while the jets have probably the best O line in football. Thomas Jones will have a huge day.

Also the Jets blitz 58% of the time and with JT O Sullivan playing and the backup O-line playing for the bengals I expect at least 4 turnovers. I am a niners fan and am WELL AWARE of Mr. JT' O Sullivan or as we called him J. turnover Sullivan

Old Post 01-02-10 05:22 PM
lf25bonds is offline Click Here to See the Profile for lf25bonds Click here to Send lf25bonds a Private Message Edit post   Report post
mikeb104
StatFox Hall of Famer

Registered: Sep 2006
Posts: 7083

This is a great thread Mr. Bonds. I have been thinking about this but had no idea how good it really was.

Thanks for sharing.




"Not everything you read on the internet is accurate"- Abraham Lincoln

Old Post 01-02-10 05:27 PM
mikeb104 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for mikeb104 Click here to Send mikeb104 a Private Message Edit post   Report post
Bromoe
FoxDen Hall of Famer

Registered: Sep 2005
Posts: 5239

FWIW...

Lot of strong trends on the Jets under as with the Bills.

Buffalo is looking at strong winds tomorrow as well.

Old Post 01-02-10 05:42 PM
Bromoe is offline Click Here to See the Profile for Bromoe Click here to Send Bromoe a Private Message Edit post   Report post
dg84


Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 992

san diego would qualify also.

Old Post 01-02-10 05:47 PM
dg84 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for dg84 Click here to Send dg84 a Private Message Edit post   Report post
dg84


Registered: Jan 2003
Posts: 992

actually washington since the chargers have the 2 seed locked in.

Old Post 01-02-10 05:48 PM
dg84 is offline Click Here to See the Profile for dg84 Click here to Send dg84 a Private Message Edit post   Report post
cisco
FoxDen Hall of Famer

Registered: Jul 2004
Posts: 8617

The NFL will ask the competition committee to review integrity-of-game and competitive-balance concerns with clinching playoff teams that choose to rest starters at the end of the season.

"This is an issue that we have reviewed in the past. The position of the competition committee, and affirmed by the clubs, when it was reviewed in 2005 was that 'a team that has clinched its division title has earned the right to rest its starters for the postseason, and that preparing for the postseason is just as important as protecting some other team's playoff opportunity.' That is the current policy," league spokesman Greg Aiello said.

"We are aware of the fan reaction and that is a factor to be considered," he continued. "Some teams that have everything clinched, like the Giants and Patriots two years ago, choose to play all out to continue or gain momentum for the playoffs. We expect to continue to review this issue."

The Colts' recent 29-15 loss to the New York Jets, which ended their shot at an undefeated season, didn't sit well with Colts fans and NFL purists.

The Colts (14-1) had nothing significant to play for, having clinched their eighth straight playoff berth in late November. In a controversial decision, coach Jim Caldwell chose to sit quarterback Peyton Manning and numerous starters for most of the second half.

The Jets' win boosted the playoff chances for New York, which can clinch a postseason spot with a victory Sunday against the Bengals. Cincinnati, which has clinched the AFC North, also might sit some of its key players in the game.

Information from ESPN senior NFL analyst Chris Mortensen and The Associated Press was used in this report.

Old Post 01-02-10 05:49 PM
cisco is offline Click Here to See the Profile for cisco Click here to Send cisco a Private Message Edit post   Report post
lf25bonds
FoxDen Hall of Famer

Registered: Oct 2006
Posts: 1309

Washington doesn't count

The reason Washington doesn't count is because San Diego is the favorite. The trend only counts towards the locked team that is a dog.

Old Post 01-02-10 05:51 PM
lf25bonds is offline Click Here to See the Profile for lf25bonds Click here to Send lf25bonds a Private Message Edit post   Report post
Post A Reply
  
Pages (4): [1] 2 3 4 »   Last Message   Next Message

Quick Links: